DiplomacyThe sanctions years
The October 1999 coup and a third layer of sanctions
When General Pervez Musharraf removed Nawaz Sharif’s government, Washington invoked the law barring aid to countries whose elected leaders are deposed by the military - adding democracy sanctions to nuclear ones.
2 min read
Sanctions
Section 508
Foreign aid appropriations law: aid barred after a military coup
Sanctions
Section 508
Foreign aid appropriations law: aid barred after a military coup
Background
Relations between Sharif and the army had deteriorated after Kargil, as each blamed the other for the withdrawal. On 12 October 1999, while General Musharraf was flying back from Sri Lanka, Sharif announced his dismissal. The army moved against the government within hours, Musharraf’s aircraft was allowed to land, and Sharif was detained. The takeover was bloodless1,2.
The US response
Washington had warned before the takeover that it would oppose any unconstitutional change of government. President Clinton described the events as another setback to Pakistani democracy and said Pakistan’s interests would be served by a prompt return to civilian rule and restoration of the democratic process3. He wrote to Musharraf setting out US expectations that democracy be restored as early as possible, and the US ambassador pressed the same message in Islamabad3,4.
On 15 October the administration invoked Section 508 of the annual foreign operations appropriations act, which prohibits most US economic and military assistance to a country whose duly elected head of government is deposed by military coup or decree5,6. In practice the step was largely symbolic, since Pakistan was already barred from most assistance under the nuclear-related Pressler and Glenn sanctions5. The coup sanctions, however, could not be waived by the president under the law as it then stood, and they became a further obstacle to any revival of the relationship6.
Perspectives
Many Pakistanis greeted the takeover with relief after a decade of unstable civilian governments, and Musharraf presented it as necessary to save the country from economic and institutional collapse. US officials, while acknowledging the failings of the elected government, insisted that a timetable for elections was essential, and Clinton expressed disappointment when none was announced3,4. Nasim Zehra’s account of the period links the coup directly to the civil–military rupture over Kargil7.
Why it mattered
The coup completed a decade of accumulating sanctions: nuclear (1990, 1998), missile (1993) and now democracy (1999). It shaped President Clinton’s brief and carefully calibrated visit to Pakistan in March 2000. After 11 September 2001, Congress authorised the president to waive the coup-related restrictions for Pakistan, and President George W. Bush did so in the years that followed8.
Sources
- Pakistani Prime Minister Ousted in Bloodless Coup, Arms Control Association (Arms Control Today), 1999 · Press
- October 12, 1999 – Coup comes to Pakistan, Past Daily · Press
- US reaction to Pakistan coup (USIA wire, 14 October 1999), GlobalSecurity.org (reproducing US government wire), 14 October 1999 · Official
- US policy toward Pakistan (chart), PBS Frontline · Reference
- US invokes Section 508 sanctions after Pakistan coup (USIA/State Department wire, 15 October 1999), GlobalSecurity.org (reproducing US government wire), 15 October 1999 · Official
- India and Pakistan: U.S. Economic Sanctions (CRS Report RS20995, 12 October 2001), Congressional Research Service via EveryCRSReport.com, 12 October 2001 · Official
- Book Review: From Kargil to the Coup (Nasim Zehra, Sang-e-Meel, 2018), Newsline · Press
- Memorandum on Waiver of Coup-Related Sanctions for Pakistan (Presidential Determination No. 2003-16), The American Presidency Project, UC Santa Barbara, 2003 · Primary document
Next in The Long ArcFive hours in Islamabad: Clinton speaks to Pakistan
