Islamabad Washington, DC

No. 39 of 103The Long Arc1980 Edition

Economy & aidThe Afghan decade

Carter offers $400 million; Zia turns it down

Washington’s first response to the invasion was a modest aid offer that Pakistan’s military ruler judged too small for the risks his country was being asked to run.

The offer

Within weeks of the Soviet invasion, the Carter administration moved to shore up Pakistan. Its offer, made in January 1980, totalled about $400 million: $200 million in credits for military equipment and $200 million in economic assistance, to be provided over roughly 18 months1. The administration also declined Pakistan’s request for advanced fighter aircraft. Brzezinski’s visit to Islamabad in early February 1980, when he publicly reaffirmed the 1959 bilateral agreement, was part of the same effort to reassure Pakistan2.

Pakistan’s response

The Pakistani reaction was cool from the start. On 17 January 1980 the foreign affairs adviser, Agha Shahi, gave the US embassy his government’s preliminary response. According to the embassy’s report, Pakistan appreciated Carter’s firm stand against the invasion, but its leaders were disappointed: $400 million was seen as inadequate given Pakistan’s military needs, including high-performance aircraft, and the $200 million in economic aid as insufficient while questions of debt rescheduling were pending3. Contemporary reports describe General Zia dismissing the offer as “peanuts”, a word that featured in American headlines when Pakistan formally declined the package in early March 19801,4. Zia and his advisers were reported to be seeking far larger sums, up to $2 billion, to rebuild the armed forces1.

Zia’s reasoning, as Pakistani commentators have since described it, was that a small package would anger the Soviet Union without making Pakistan materially safer4. Pakistan was also wary of a US commitment that Congress might not honour, and of aid that came with conditions on its nuclear programme.

What followed

The rejection left the Carter administration uncertain how to proceed5. Contacts continued: Zia visited Washington in October 1980, when he was in the United States to address the UN General Assembly as spokesman of the Islamic Conference, and Carter told him of Americans’ admiration for Pakistan’s response to the Afghan refugee crisis6,7. But no new package was agreed before Carter left office.

Why it mattered

Zia’s gamble paid off. The incoming Reagan administration offered a package eight times as large, together with F-16 aircraft. The episode set a pattern that would recur in the relationship: Pakistan, conscious of its value to Washington at moments of crisis, bargaining hard over the scale and terms of US assistance.

Sources

  1. Pakistan rejects 'peanuts' in American military aid, The Christian Science Monitor, 6 March 1980 · Press
  2. Afghanistan crisis yields critical policy, The Christian Science Monitor, 4 February 1980 · Press
  3. 413. Telegram From the Embassy in Pakistan to the Department of State (FRUS 1977–1980, Vol. XIX, South Asia), Office of the Historian, US Department of State, 17 January 1980 · Primary document
  4. The Carter years – II, The News on Sunday (The News International) · Press
  5. US worry: what to do now after Pakistani aid rejection, The Christian Science Monitor, 18 March 1980 · Press
  6. 466. Memorandum of Conversation, 3 October 1980 (FRUS 1977–1980, Vol. XIX), Office of the Historian, US Department of State, 3 October 1980 · Primary document
  7. Pakistan – Visits by Foreign Leaders, Office of the Historian, US Department of State · Official

Next in The Long ArcReagan’s $3.2 billion package and the F-16 deal